Penn et al.
BudgetIV: Optimal partial identification of causal effects with mostly invalid instruments. arXiv preprint, 2411.06913.
Yin et al.
Hierarchical fuzzy model-agnostic explanations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.
Ziosi et al.
A genealogical approach to algorithmic bias. Minds and Machines, 34(9).
Watson et al.
Bounding causal effects with leaky instruments. Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.
Watson et al.
Explaining predictive uncertainty with information theoretic Shapley values. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36, pp. 7330-7350.
Bravo-Hermsdorff et al.
Intervention generalization: A view from factor graph models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36, pp. 43662-43675.
Polonioli et al.
The ethics of online controlled experiments (A/B testing). Minds and Machines, 33, 667-693.
Watson
On the philosophy of unsupervised learning. Philosophy & Technology, 36(28).
Watson et al.
Adversarial random forests for density estimation and generative modeling. Proceedings of The 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 5357-5375.
Padh et al.
Stochastic causal programming for bounding treatment effects. Proceedings of The 2nd Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, pp. 142-176.
Mökander et al.
The switch, the ladder, and the matrix: Models for classifying AI systems. Minds and Machines, 33, 221-248.
Desai et al.
The epistemological foundations of data science: A critical analysis. Synthese, 200(6), 469.
Watson & Silva
Causal discovery under a confounder blanket. Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2096-2106.
The RA-MAP Consortium
RA-MAP, molecular immunological landscapes in early rheumatoid arthritis and healthy vaccine recipients. Scientific Data, 9(196).
Watson
Rational Shapley values. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 1083-1094.
Watson et al.
Local explanations via necessity and sufficiency: Unifying theory and practice. Minds and Machines, 32(1), 185-218.
Watson
Conceptual challenges for interpretable machine learning. Synthese, 200(2), 65-98.
Watson
Interpretable machine learning for genomics. Human Genetics, 141(9), 1499-1513.
Marchal & Watson
The paradox of poor representation: How voter–party incongruence curbs affective polarisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(4), 668-685.
Watson & Wright
Testing conditional independence in supervised learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 110(8), 2107-2129.
Gultchin et al.
Operationalizing complex causes: A pragmatic view of mediation. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3875-3885.
Watson
Explaining black box algorithms: Epistemological challenges and machine learning solutions. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oxford.
Kinney & Watson
Causal feature learning for utility-maximizing agents. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models, pp. 257-268.
Nicholls et al.
Reaching the end-game for GWAS: Machine learning approaches for the prioritization of complex disease loci. Frontiers in Genetics, 11, 350.
Watson & Floridi
The explanation game: A formal framework for interpretable machine learning. Synthese, 198(10), 9211-9242.
John et al.
M3C: Monte Carlo reference based consensus clustering. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1816.
John et al.
Spectrum: Fast density-aware spectral clustering for single and multi-omic data. Bioinformatics, 36(4), 1159-1166.
Watson
The rhetoric and reality of anthropomorphism in artificial intelligence. Minds & Machines, 29(3), 414-440.
Öhman & Watson
Are the dead taking over facebook? A big data approach to the future of death online. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 1-13.
O'Toole et al.
Oncometabolite induced primary cilia loss in pheochromocytoma. Endocrine-Related Cancer, 26(1), 165-180.
Watson et al.
Clinical applications of machine learning algorithms: Beyond the black box. BMJ, 346, 446-448.
Watson
The price of discovery: A model of scientific research markets. In Öhman, C. & Watson, D. (Eds), The 2018 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab, pp. 51-63.
Foulkes et al.
A framework for multi-omic prediction of treatment response to biologic therapy for psoriasis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 139(1), 100-107.
Watson & Floridi
Crowdsourced science: Sociotechnical epistemology in the e-research paradigm. Synthese, 195(2), 741-764.